Court Officially Adopts Common Interest Rule
The Writ, Appellate Briefs, June 1, 2018
In the recent case of James J. Cotter, Jr. v. Eighth Judicial District Court, 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 32, the Court was faced with the question as to whether the disclosure of work-product documents to third parties constitutes a waiver of the work-product privilege. Upon review, the Court formally adopted the common interest rule, which allows attorneys to share work-product with third parties that have a common interest in litigation without waiving work-product protection.
In Cotter, James Cotter was the CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Reading International, Inc. After Reading terminated him, he filed a complaint in district court alleging breach of fiduciary duties against several members of Reading’s Board of Directors. At the same time, a number of Reading’s shareholders filed a separate derivative action in district court against the same Director Defendants related to Cotter’s firing. The district court consolidated the two actions. To read entire article click here.
About McDonald Carano
McDonald Carano has helped to shape the Nevada business and legal landscape for nearly 70 years. With more than 60 lawyers and government affairs professionals in our offices in Las Vegas and Reno, we are Nevada's law firm for business. We proudly represent Fortune 500 companies, financial and governmental institutions, fast-growth and mid-market companies, entrepreneurs, start-up ventures, non-profit organizations and individuals. Our attorneys deliver cross-discipline, one-stop, commercial law and government affairs counsel. Our dedication to clients, innovative thinking and practical solutions based in sound business and legal judgments are at the heart of our practice. For more information, visit mcdonaldcarano.com, call 775.788.2000 (Reno office), or 702.873.4100 (Las Vegas office) or reach us by email at email@example.com.
You have chosen to send an email to McDonald Carano. The sending or receipt of this email and the information in it does not in itself create an attorney-client relationship. If you are not already a client, you should not provide us with information that you wish to have treated as privileged or confidential without first speaking to one of our lawyers. If you provide information before we confirm that you are a client and that we are willing and able to represent you, we may not be required to treat that information as privileged, confidential, or protected information, and we may be able to represent a party adverse to you.
I have read this and want to send an email.